The Nielson Group
Applicant Assessments
Organizational Change
The Challenge for HR
Assessment
High-Performing Teams
Workplace Stress
Breakthrough Change
Board Support
Coaching
Talent Development
TriMetrix Talent Assessments
Outplacement Services
Meeting Mayhem
Our Blog
About Us
Client references
Contact
 


McKinsey states most boards do not focus enough time shaping an agenda for the future.

Debate over the role of company boards invariably intensifies when things go wrong on a grand scale, as has happened in recent years. Many of the companies whose corpses litter the industrial and financial landscape were undermined by negligent, overoptimistic, or ill-informed boards prior to the financial crisis and the ensuing deep recession.

Not surprisingly, there’s been a renewed focus on improved corporate governance: better structures, more rigorous vetting of executive hires, and greater independence by non-executives, for example. Governance arguably suffers most, though, when boards spend too much time looking in the rear-view mirror and not enough scanning the road ahead.

Today’s board agendas, are surprisingly similar to those of a century ago, when the second Industrial Revolution was at its peak. Directors still spend the bulk of their time on quarterly reports, audit reviews, budgets, and compliance—70 percent is not atypical—instead of focusing on matters crucial to the future prosperity and direction of the business.

The alternative is to develop a dynamic board agenda that explicitly highlights these forward-looking activities and ensures that they get sufficient time over a 12-month period. The Nielson Group specializes in supporting the talent management portion of the board's key accountabilities.

The Nielson Group offers several areas to support board initiatives:

  • Board role clarity - formation of key accountabilities
  • Key talent due diligence for mergers and acquisitions
  • Board reinvention - customized board 360 evaluation, board-process enhancement
  • Executive talent assessment and coaching
  • Executive candidate talent assessment


Key to any board function or dysfunction is based on how well the board’s role has been defined. The familiar roles of a well-functioning board—such as setting strategy, monitoring risks, planning the succession, and weighing in on the talent pipeline—are easy to list.

But in practice, things are never simple. CEOs and their top teams, for example, are often touchy about what they see as board interference. Manage teams and board members must have a high trust level to leverage the relationship.

Weighty boards with years of experience and members used to getting their own way are frequently frustrated because they can’t intervene more actively or they feel their advice is ignored. It’s critical to defuse these tensions at the outset by clearly defining the board’s role and establishing well-understood boundaries. Unless roles are clear, the relationship between the CEO and management, on the one hand, and the board, on the other, risks devolving into misunderstandings, loss of trust, and ineffectiveness.

An annual discussion between the board and management, including development of a set of key accountabilities for each member of the management team and the board provides incredible role clarity that benefits all stakeholders. The Nielson Group ensures this is always a productive exercise.

For instance, a large Nordic investment company creates work and role descriptions, for the board and management, that are reviewed and approved every year. This process always generates valuable discussions and makes roles more clear.


Unleashing the full power of key organizational talent is a key accountability of forward-looking boards. Boards are powerfully positioned to focus on long-term talent-development efforts because they understand the strategy and can override some of the personal ties that cloud decision making over appointments.

Business unit managers, might be tempted to hang on to high performers even if it is in the company’s best interest strategically to reallocate their skills and experience to a business or role with more potential. For example, a large media company, prompted by its board, recently reassigned its strategic-planning director to lead digital development projects on the US West Coast. The move was remarkably successful: working in close cooperation with some of the most accomplished digital giants in the United States, the business quickly got up to speed on the newest technological trends.

Key Talent Reviews
Many forward-looking boards hold annual reviews of the top 30 to 50 talents, always with an eye on those who might eventually be suitable for key executive roles. Here’s how The Nielson Group process works. Each executive director selects, for presentation to the board, three to five promising managers. The board receives a photograph, educational and work background, performance reviews over the last three years, 360 Feedback Survey results and talent assessment results. The Nielson Group organizes the information into a executive packet and applies key information onto an evaluation grid showing categories such as goal achievement, leadership, teamwork, and personal development. The directors then spend 10 to 30 minutes on each person, discussing key questions and assigning the person the appropriate location on a 9-box grid.

Supporting Key Talent Development
The board has an incredibly powerful role when it comes to retaining and developing top talent. How can the company coach and develop talented people? What personal and professional development opportunities, such as an international posting, might help broaden an individual’s experience? What are the potential next career steps? In addition, during corporate projects, client gatherings, and trade shows, directors should take any opportunity to meet—and assess—upcoming executives and fast trackers informally.

Key talent can be developed faster and retained when organizations offer coaching. Having a board member assigned as a sponsor for the coaching gives the coaching much greater importance and exposure. Hiring The Nielson Group to deliver the coaching ensures alignment between the individual, senior executive management and the board.

The key is that the board must agree with management on a sensible approach to reviewing and developing executive talent. Appointing a board member with a successful people-leadership track record to lead the effort is one way of boosting its impact. Engaging The Nielson Group to partner with the assigned board member to provide the objective 3rd party work necessary ensures the impact is high-quality and effective.